November 17, 2009
01/23/2012 Federal Health Research Cuts: You Can’t Have it Both Ways
01/09/2012 The Latest (Not Greatest) on Essential Benefits
12/19/2011 Complexity and Confusion: The Challenge of Communicating About the Affordable Care Act
health reform essential benefits costs health policy aca reform coverage cost sgr politics congress drugs class long term care quality va employers e-prescribing emrs patient safety medicaid states medicare for-profit nonprofit block grant tanf welfare reform hospice end of life non-profit evidence-based care waste washtenaw county uninsured acos population health managed care cms access cancer end-of-life care individual mandate ryan proposal obesity pharmaceutical industry r & d comparative effectiveness research evidence based care quality improvement collaborative quality initiatives cqi pharmaceuticals regulations prematurity exchanges heath reform antibiotics overuse geographic variation medical appropriateness health websites imrt radiation therapy medical errors constitutionality courts research translate health care economics rationing insurance regulation incentives cardiology pcmh health disparities election british health care system safety net fqhc guidelines variation radiology pain early childhood electronic medical records physician employment aco dartmouth atlas cover michigan health care coverage insurance preventive care public health

Director
Center for Healthcare Research & Transformation
“Breast-screening advice is Upended” (Wall Street Journal, November 17, 2009)
For years, we have been told that we should have a mammogram every year after age 40 and in 2002, this advice was repeated by the same folks who now are recommending that most women can wait until 50 for routine mammograms. Does it make anyone think about the margarine vs. butter debate? I don’t want to debate the merit of these new guidelines – that’s another topic that has generated a lot of buzz in the blogosphere. Rather, I think this change in guidelines is illustrative of an important issue related to health reform: what is the role of each of us as consumers of health care?
When some health reformers talk about the need for personal responsibility in health care, they sometimes liken it to the way an informed consumer should take care of their car. But, I am sorry, I think we know a lot more about when and how we need to change the oil in our car engines than we know about the way the body works and what works best in taking care of ourselves. Yes, there are some certainties. Tobacco is bad for you. Too many calories result in obesity and that is also bad. But, guidelines are just that – they give advice but don’t give definitive answers. And science is ever changing and illuminating new understandings that are not immutable.
Do consumers have a role in health care – is there personal responsibility? Yes, of course, consumers have to be part of the equation. Indeed, consumers are the ones who suffer most directly from the effects of poor health choices. But we also can’t be so quick to judge the role consumers need to play when they are confused about what they should and shouldn’t do. We all want simple and easy answers to the health care cost dilemma. So, we often turn to things that sound good – like personal responsibility. But, when guidelines change after years of sounding so certain, it’s no wonder consumers are just confused.
No one has commented on this page yet.
RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments